Turn the interview into evidence, not a memory.
Interview feedback is usually a few lines written from memory. Upload the transcript and get a structured evaluation against the job's requirements, with the candidate's own words as proof.
Try it on a candidate→2 free actions · Unlimited with any recruiter plan
Backend Engineer, 48 min interview. The candidate gave concrete examples on production Python and pipeline design, and the interview did not reach stakeholder work.
Described owning a service end to end, including on-call.
“I wrote the ingestion service in Python and carried the pager for it for two years.” ✓ VERIFIED
Explained batching choices but not failure handling.
“We moved to hourly batches because the source API rate-limited us.” ✓ VERIFIED
The interview never touched this. Not assessed.
Resume says “led a team of 6”. In the interview they described working alongside two engineers.
Tell us about a time a pipeline failed overnight. How did you find out, and what changed afterwards?
Upload the transcript
Drop in the file Zoom, Meet or Teams gave you, or paste the text, and attach it to the candidate.
Confirm who is who
Rezumz matches the candidate by name and shows every speaker. Correct anything before it's analysed.
Review the evaluation
Each requirement is marked demonstrated, partial, a concern, or not covered, with verified quotes and a suggested rating you can edit.
Requirement-by-requirement
Assessed against the job's own must-haves. If the interview never touched one, it says so instead of guessing.
Verified quotes
Evidence is quoted from the candidate's words and checked against the transcript, so nothing is made up.
Resume discrepancies
Flags where what was said in the interview differs from the resume, with the quote beside it.
Next-round questions
Follow-ups that probe the gaps and unclear areas, ready for the next interviewer.
VTT, SRT, TXT, DOCX and PDF, plus pasted text. That covers the transcripts exported by Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Otter and Fireflies.
Most transcripts include speaker names. Rezumz matches the candidate by name against their resume, shows you every detected speaker, and lets you correct it before anything is analysed. If a transcript has no names, it says so and the result is marked as less reliable.
No. It's decision support. The evaluation shows evidence against each requirement, and the rating is a suggestion you can change. Nothing is rejected or moved automatically.
Every quote is checked against the candidate's actual words after the AI writes it. A quote that isn't in the transcript is removed rather than shown.
No. It's instructed to use only job-related evidence and never to comment on or infer age, gender, ethnicity, accent, health, family status, or similar characteristics.
Only upload a transcript of an interview where the candidate knew it was being recorded or transcribed. A transcript contains their personal data, and you can delete it, along with its evaluation, at any time.
Make the decision from what was said.
Upload an interview transcript and review the evidence in minutes.