How to Answer 'What Are Your Salary Expectations?'
The core principle: whoever names a number first usually loses some negotiating room, so the goal is to deflect once genuinely, then answer with a well-researched range if pushed — never a single number, and never a number you haven't researched.
The deflection, done right
'I'd love to learn more about the full scope of the role first before landing on a number — can you share the budgeted range for this position?' This is a completely normal, professional response, and most experienced interviewers expect it. It's not evasive or awkward if delivered calmly and once — the mistake is deflecting repeatedly when they clearly want an answer, which starts to read as difficult rather than savvy.
If they push back and ask again
Give a researched range, not a single number, and anchor it slightly above your actual minimum: 'Based on my research for this role and my experience level, I'm looking at a range of $X to $Y.' Research the range beforehand using sites like Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, LinkedIn Salary, and Payscale, cross-referenced — a single source can be skewed. Set your range's low end at the true minimum you'd accept, not a number you hope sounds modest; giving a range you wouldn't actually accept the bottom of wastes everyone's time.
If you're asked to give a number before an offer stage
It's increasingly common (and in some US states legally required for the employer to share a range upfront) for salary expectations to come up on a first screening call, before you've even met the hiring manager. Same principle applies — deflect once toward their range, then give a researched range if pushed, rather than a single figure this early in the process, when you have the least leverage and the least information about the actual role's full scope.
Never lie about your current salary, but you don't have to volunteer it
In many US states and countries, employers are legally barred from asking your current salary at all — know your local law. Where it's still asked, you're not obligated to answer with a specific figure even if the law doesn't explicitly forbid the question; a polite redirect ('I'd prefer to focus on the value I'd bring to this specific role and its market rate') is a reasonable, common response.
The number you give will likely become your anchor — pick it carefully
Whatever range you state tends to become the working anchor for the rest of the negotiation, even at offer stage. This is exactly why research matters more here than almost anywhere else in the job search — a range set too low based on outdated or wrong data can cost you real money for the entire tenure of the role, since future raises are typically percentage-based off your starting number.
Frequently asked questions
Should I give a number first when asked about salary expectations?
No, deflect once toward asking for the role's budgeted range — whoever names a number first generally loses some negotiating leverage. If pushed a second time, give a researched range, not a single figure.
What if the interviewer insists I give a salary number?
Provide a well-researched range (using Levels.fyi, Glassdoor, LinkedIn Salary, cross-referenced), anchored above your true minimum. Never give a single number, and never give a range you wouldn't actually accept the low end of.
Do I have to answer if asked about my current salary?
In many US states and other countries, employers are legally barred from asking this at all. Where it's still asked, you can decline to give a specific figure and redirect toward the market rate for the role instead.
Does the salary number I give become the anchor for the rest of negotiation?
Yes, typically — the range you state early tends to anchor the rest of the conversation through to offer stage, which is why researching the real market rate beforehand matters more here than in most other parts of the job search.